Legal Opinion

In Re: Wallace, Rush, Schmidt, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided September 29, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00196Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: WALLACE, RUSH, SCHMIDT, CIVIL ACTION INC. NO: 23-00196 SECTION: T ORDER Before the Court is an appeal from the bankruptcy court’s ruling denying the Debtor’s Motion to Re-Open Chapter 11 Case to Enforce Plan Provisions, R. Doc. 1-3, filed by Wallace, Rush, Schmidt, Inc. (“WRS or “Debtor”), pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 350(b).1 WRS filed its appellant brief (R. Doc. 4), to which the Kristina Claimants have filed an appellee brief in response. R. Doc. 5. WRS has filed a reply brief. R. Doc. 6. The Court has appellate jurisdiction…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. In the Matter of Mack L. Killebrew and Delores B. Killebrew, Debtors. Mack L. Killebrew and Delores B. Killebrew v. Charles A. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  3. In the Matter of Alan J. Faden Harriet B. Faden, Debtors. Alan J. Faden Harriet B. Faden v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Drehsen v. Bank of St. Petersburg (In Re Drehsen)District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
  5. Magnificent Eight, L.L.C. v. Work Construction Co. (In re Work Construction Co.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API