Legal Opinion

People v. Zavarro

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The judgment of conviction of defendant-appellant Isaac Zavarro should he affirmed.

The judgment of conviction of defendant-appellant Mark Zavarro should he reversed and a new trial ordered. Upon their joint trial for arson, neither defendant testified nor did either give a confession to police authorities. However, there was introduced in evidence an admission by the defendant Isaac Zavarro to a private party which implicated his brother Mark and which the trial judge instructed the jury was “ admissible only against the defendant who made it ”. Under settled principles, it was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Roberts v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. People v. BooneNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. PapaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. People v. HalpinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. People v. BoylingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. People v. BurgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API