People v. Zavarro
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The judgment of conviction of defendant-appellant Isaac Zavarro should he affirmed.
The judgment of conviction of defendant-appellant Mark Zavarro should he reversed and a new trial ordered. Upon their joint trial for arson, neither defendant testified nor did either give a confession to police authorities. However, there was introduced in evidence an admission by the defendant Isaac Zavarro to a private party which implicated his brother Mark and which the trial judge instructed the jury was “ admissible only against the defendant who made it ”. Under settled principles, it was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Roberts v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. BooneNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. PapaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- People v. HalpinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- People v. BoylingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- People v. BurgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976