Legal Opinion

Dunham v. Wisconsin Gas & Electric Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

The defendants first contend that the plaintiff failed to meet the burden of proving negligence on their part, and that the defendants were guilty of no negligence and violated no duty which they owed to’ the plaintiff. These contentions necessitate a recitation of the facts.

On August 17, 1936, the plaintiff, who' at that time was sixty-six years of age and weighed one hundred ninety pounds, was standing on the west crosswalk of Park avenue, a north-and-south street, in the city of Racine. She had stepped from the sidewalk and had taken two or three steps into the street. She intended to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cummings v. National Furnace Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Stimson v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Kirst v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Ashton v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Zweck-Wollenberg Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. MatsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Brunner v. Van HoofWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Mayr v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Du Bois v. De BaucheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API