Murray v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant insists that the evidence is insufficient, as a matter of law, to overturn the presumption of insanity attaching by reason of the Oklahoma judgment, and that we erred in reaching a contrary conclusion.

Attention is called to the fact that the undisputed evidence shows:(a) That appellant, by force, brutally raped the prosecutrix, and assaulted, by inflicting serious injuries with a knife, her young male companion;(b) That, while fleeing from the scene of the crime, and in attempting to make his escape, appellant was accosted by two farmers, who…