Legal Opinion

Steinmann v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 27, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.

The action is upon a policy of life insurance issued by the defendant upon the life of William Steinmann designating the plaintiff, his wife, as beneficiary. The policy contains provisions for double indemnity in the event of the death of the assured by accident. On May 25, 1938, William Steinmann died as the result of asphyxiation by illuminating gas under circumstances which would have justified a finding by the jury that he had met death by suicide. Upon the death of William Steinmann the defendant paid to the plaintiff the face amount of the policy but refused to pay the double indemnity,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. GamerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Whitlatch v. . Fidelity and Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Weidy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schelberger v. Eastern Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Recckio v. RecckioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Goell v. United States Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  4. C-Suzanne Beauty Salon, Ltd. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. C-Suzanne Beauty Salon, Ltd. v. General Insurance Company Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API