Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Union State Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 25, 1993No. 92-51PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

Gerald D. Hunter and Pearl A. Hunter lost 360 acres of farmland to Union State Bank through foreclosure. Later the bank accepted offers of purchase on four separate parcels of the land from four different buyers. All of the offers were subject to the Hunters’ right to repurchase under Iowa Code section 524.910(2) (1987). The bank gave notice to the Hunters of these purchase offers and of them repurchase rights under section 524.-910(2). When the Hunters failed to respond to the notices by exercising their right to repurchase, the bank completed the sales to the third parties.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Superior/Ideal v. OSKALOOSA BD. OF REV.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. Knepper v. Monticello State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  4. Buchholz v. Board of Adjustment of Bremer CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  5. State Ex Rel. Miller v. National Dietary Research, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of SeylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  2. State of Tennessee v. Justin EllisTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Darla Legg and Jason T. Legg, on Behalf of Themselves and All Persons Similarly Situated v. West BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. Financial Marketing Services, Inc. v. Hawkeye Bank & Trust of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. Credit Bureau Enterprises, Inc. v. PeloSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API