Borden, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO TRANSFER; CONFERENCE CALL SET
RICE, District Judge.
I. Introduction
On February 19, 1981, this Court filed an entry in the above-captioned action, denying the motion of Defendant Texaco, Inc. (Texaco), to transfer the within case to the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (Doc. # 29). The Court’s decision was based primarily upon the fact that both parties had submitted inadequate factual data. Therefore, the Court granted the Defendant twenty-one days within which to file a renewed motion for transfer, and further designated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. v. RitterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Satkowiak v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
- AMF, INC. v. Computer Automation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
- Satkowiak v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985