Legal Opinion

Borden, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 3, 1981No. C-3-80-510PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO TRANSFER; CONFERENCE CALL SET

RICE, District Judge.

I. Introduction

On February 19, 1981, this Court filed an entry in the above-captioned action, denying the motion of Defendant Texaco, Inc. (Texaco), to transfer the within case to the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (Doc. # 29). The Court’s decision was based primarily upon the fact that both parties had submitted inadequate factual data. Therefore, the Court granted the Defendant twenty-one days within which to file a renewed motion for transfer, and further designated…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. v. RitterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Satkowiak v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. AMF, INC. v. Computer Automation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
  3. Satkowiak v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API