Legal Opinion
Rodd v. Raritan Radiologic Assocs.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 24, 2004PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
860 A.2d 1003 (2004)
373 N.J. Super. 154
Joseph RODD, Administrator Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Maria Rodd, and Joseph Rodd, Individually, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
RARITAN RADIOLOGIC ASSOCIATES, P.A., Stuart Kotler, M.D., Defendants-Appellants.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted October 5, 2004.
Decided November 24, 2004.
Greenberg, Dauber, Epstein & Tucker, Newark, for appellants (Melvin Greenberg and Sumeeta A. Gawande, on the brief).
Eichen Levinson, Edison, for respondents (William D. Levinson, on the brief).
Before Judges SKILLMAN, PARRILLO and GRALL.
The opinion of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. FeasterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- State v. ScherzerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Nooner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- American Oil Co. v. ValentiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. SwintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jackowitz v. LangNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Szczecina v. PV Holding Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Nuwave Investment Corp. v. Hyman Beck & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Morales-Hurtado v. ReinosoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- Szczecina v. Pv Holding Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.