Aluminum Company of America v. Benz-Stoddard
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHER, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from an order sustaining appellees’ special exceptions and holding that as a matter of law appellee Claire Benz-Stoddard is entitled to well completions in all reservoirs underlying her .115 acre townlot tract. The Trial Court dismissed the suit upon appellants’ refusal to amend their petition, because the petition does not state a cause of action for cancellation of the permit granted by the Commission to drill a first well and to complete it in any separate reservoir beneath such tract which may be found to be productive.
This is a Rule 37 case…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. RAILROAD COM'N OF TEXASTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Railroad Commission v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Halbouty v. DarseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
3Cited by4 opinions
- Benz-Stoddard v. Aluminum Company of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Woods Exploration & Prod. Co. v. Aluminum Co. of Amer.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
- Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. Railroad Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. Railroad Commission of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003