Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Wolf v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1991No. 89-1091Published

1Concurring in the judgmentSchwelb, Associate Judge

In light of Brisker v. District of Columbia, 510 A.2d 1037, 1040 (D.C.1986), I believe that I am compelled to vote to affirm the decision of the trial court. I do so with considerable reluctance, however, for I have serious concerns as to whether the *1313taxpayer was treated fairly or even rationally by the District’s “revenue men,” here the officials of the Department of Finance and Revenue (DFR). Accordingly, although there is much in Judge Ferren’s opinion for the court with which I can agree, I join only in the judgment.

I

The sequence of events in this case would surely startle a reasonable…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Rabinowitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  4. People Ex Rel. Hilton v. FahrenkopfNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Tri-Terminal Corp. v. Borough of EdgewaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API