Hillard v. Remington Typewriter Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This cause comes here upon appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court, Southern District of New York, dismissing a bill in equity charging infringement of two patents granted to complainant, viz., No. 554,874 (February 18, 1896) and No. 580,281 (April 6, 1897),. both for improvement in typewriting machines.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This cause comes here upon appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court, Southern District of New York, dismissing a bill in equity charging infringement of two patents granted to complainant, viz., No. 554,874 (February 18, 1896) and No. 580,281 (April 6, 1897),. both for improvement in typewriting machines. The second of these patents was by Judge Ray held valid and infringed in Hillard v. Fisher Book Typewriter Co. (C. C.) 151 Fed. 34. That decision was affirmed by this court. 159 Fed. 439, 86 C. C. A.…
1Opinion of the Court
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
The details of the complicated 'device covered by these patents, which are voluminous,' covering 22 pages of printed matter and 38 figures, will be found set forth with sufficient fullness in the opinions above cited. It would serve no useful purpose to rehearse them nor to endeavor to epitomize them here. They deal with means for securing two functions, “camming back” and “repulser action,” of which the first is claimed in the earlier patent, and the second in the later one. On the former appeal we held that it was proper to carve out of the earlier application the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Hillard v. Fisher Book Typewriter Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912