Legal Opinion
Mihalko v. Continental Bank & Trust Co. (In Re Mihalko)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 17, 1988No. 15-18793PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUCE I. FOX, Bankruptcy Judge:
The filing of a secured proof of claim by Continental Bank and Trust Company (Continental) has triggered two related disputes, which have been consolidated and now must be resolved. First, the debtor, Emil Mihalko, filed an objection to Continental’s proof of claim contending that the sum claimed is. excessive and requesting that any claim allowed be classified as unsecured; second, the debtor initiated an adversary proceeding raising 11 U.S.C. § 506(a), (d) and arguing that both the value of Continental’s collateral and the priority of Continental’s…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In the Matter of Mobile Steel Company, Debtor. Elaine E. Benjamin v. Lester Y. Diamond, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for Mobile Steel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Lawrence Tractor Co. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Meyer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Best Products Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- In Re JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
- In Re Colonial Center, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- In Re Executive House AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- In Re BorgesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.