Piazza v. Kirkbride
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Dissent
Justice NEWBY dissenting.
**169The majority's message to the business community is clear: Individuals serve as outside directors at their own peril! If a director makes an alleged misstatement to a potential investor, no matter how minute and regardless of whether the investor relied on it, the director may be personally liable. Today's decision eviscerates any protection for an outside director who uses information communicated by corporate officers to tell others of potential investment opportunities. In fact, the majority ratifies the outside director's *500liability, even though the corporate…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Smith v. Van GorkomSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- In Re Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
- Gantler v. StephensSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.