Matthews & Son v. Richards
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Cartersville—Judge Moon. May 1, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodwoeth, J.
-1. All paragraphs of the plea as amended which were lacking in legal sufficiency were stricken by the court on demurrer. There was no error in refusing to strike the other paragraphs.
2. Even if testimony as to a certain promissory note, that the note “was given for the purpose of renewing the old note and extending the time of payment,” was a conclusion of the witness, and improperly admitted, it was harmless, as the record discloses that other evidence' in practically the same words was admitted without objection; and there was positive evidence of the same fact. Daughtry v. Savannah &c.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Daughtry v. Savannah & Statesboro Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Southern Railway Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- County of Butts v. HixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Matthews & Son v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- McRae v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Hudson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.