Legal Opinion

Griswold v. City of Homer

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1996No. S-6532Published

1Opinion of the Court

925 P.2d 1015 (1996)

Frank S. GRISWOLD, Appellant,

v.

CITY OF HOMER, Appellee.

No. S-6532.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

October 25, 1996.

Frank S. Griswold, Homer, pro se.

Gordon J. Tans, Perkins Coie, Anchorage, for Appellee.

Before MOORE, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and EASTAUGH, JJ.

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In 1992 the Homer City Council adopted Ordinance 92-18 amending Homer's zoning and planning code to allow motor vehicle sales and services on thirteen lots in Homer's Central Business District. Frank Griswold claims Ordinance 92-18 is invalid because it constitutes spot zoning. We…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Buell v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Gruber v. Mayor and Tp. Committee of Raritan Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  4. Falcon v. Alaska Public Offices CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Gates v. City of Tenakee SpringsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API