Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Fohl v. Karel

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 28, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] In this Habeas Corpus proceeding Mr. Chief Justice ELLIS, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice CHAPMAN are of the opinion that the affidavit and warrant under which Petitioner is held failed to allege a criminal offense and that therefore the Petitioner should be discharged from custody, while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice BROWN and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of a contrary opinion and think the Petitioner should be remanded to the custody of the Respondent. When…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. D & L HARROD, INC. v. US Precast Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Driver's Dispatch, Inc. v. Florida Railroad & Public Utilities CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. State ex rel. Florida Railroad & Public Utilities Commission v. IngallsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  4. Lowe v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Coleman v. City of Pensacola, Circuit Court of the 1st Judicial Circuit of Florida, Escambia County1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API