Legal Opinion

Sheehy v. Clausen

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1899Published

Taxpayer’s action to restrain certain public officers of the city of ¡New York from the commission of alleged illegal acts, which, if committed, it is claimed would be a waste of the property of said city.

1Opinion of the CourtMattice, J.

The plaintiff, as a taxpayer, brings this action to restrain certain public officers of the city of New York, from the commission of alleged illegal acts, which, if committed, it is claimed would be a waste of the property of the city.

The action was commenced before the Greater New York charter went into effect, and was aimed at the commissioners of the department of public parks and the board of electrical control, and the Bronx Gas & Electric Company. It sought to prevent the last-named company from erecting poles and stringing wires along the highways and avenues in Pelham Bay park,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hart v. MayorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Sheehy v. McMillanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API