Legal Opinion
United States v. Jiminez
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided May 31, 1978No. 78-30091-NA-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MORTON, Chief Judge.
Defendants were indicted in three counts by the federal grand jury. The first count charged defendants with conspiring to introduce marijuana into a federal penal or correctional institution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; the second count charged them with introducing marijuana into a federal penal or correctional institution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1791 1 and 28 C.F.R. § 6.1; 2 and the third count charged them with knowingly and intentionally possessing marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844(a). According to the indictment, defendants introduced the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Logue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Randolph v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Jerry E. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- State of Iowa v. Jillian Jane StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- State v. CaquelinCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2005
- United States v. Ricardo GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. CardonaDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.