Legal Opinion

NatWest Bank N.A. v. Grauberd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 20, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Summary judgment should have been denied on the ground that triable issues of fact were raised as to the commercial reasonableness of plaintiff bank’s conduct regarding the preservation of its collateral, which included assets of the Pan-American Diamond Corp. ("PAD”) (see, Marine Midland Bank *338v CMR Indus., 159 AD2d 94). Contrary to plaintiff bank’s assertion, a lender’s obligation to deal in a commercially reasonable manner with collateral securing a loan may not be waived by a guarantor as a matter of law (see, supra, at 106-107; Weinsten v Fleet Factors Corp., 210 AD2d 74).

Defendants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marine Midland Bank v. CMR Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Weinsten v. Fleet Factors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nugent v. HubbardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Chemical Bank v. Gem Trak, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Center Capital Corp. v. Jr Lear 60-099, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  4. Nugent v. HubbardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API