Legal Opinion

Banco Nacional Ultramarino v. Newton

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 19, 1921PublishedCited by 1 opinion

At Raw. Action by the Banco Nacional Ultramarino against Byron R. Newton, Collector of Customs, District No. 10. On demurrer and motion to strike separate defenses.

1Opinion of the CourtGarvin, District Judge

Plaintiff has demurred to the fourth separate defense set forth in defendant’s answer to the amended complaint upon the ground that the same is insufficient in law. The demurrer is brought on for argument, with a motion by plaintiff to strike out the “first,” “second,” and “third” defenses contained in defendant’s answer, on the ground that they are irrelevant, and the “fifth” defense on the ground that it is sham.

[1] The action is to recover $6,279, the value of 381 boxes of sardines, the property of plaintiff, which defendant, without authority and unlawfully, delivered to the firm of R. C.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robertson v. SichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Brissac v. LawrenceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1850

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Malewicki v. QvaleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API