Legal Opinion

American Crayon Co. v. Prang Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 18, 1928No. 618PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

By bill of complaint and counterclaim the parties charge each other with trade-mark infringement and unfair competition. Each claims the right to use the word “Prang” as the name or mark for certain school and art supplies and that the other has infringed that right. To support and establish its alleged right, each relies upon a distinct contract made by it with the Prang Company, a Maine corporation established in 1856, whose school and art supply business included the sale of many separate articles, probably 70 or 80, under the name or mark “Prang.” By the two…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manhattan Medicine Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Edward Thompson Co. v. American Law Book Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Du Pont Cellophane Co. v. Waxed Products Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1934
  2. Prang Co. v. American Crayon Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
  3. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
  4. Columbian Art Works, Inc. v. Defiance Slaes Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
  5. American Crayon Co. v. Prang Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API