State v. Lopez
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EDMUNDS, Justice.
In this case we consider the extent to which a party in a criminal case may address the jury as to defendant’s potential sentence. We conclude that the prosecutor’s argument detailing the effect of the jury’s finding of an aggravating factor on defendant’s sentence was inaccurate and misleading. Therefore, the trial court erred in - overruling defendant’s objection to this argument. However, because we also find that the error was harmless, we affirm the result reached by the Court of Appeals.
*536At trial, the State presented evidence that at approximately six o’clock p.m. on 19…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. KemmerlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HurtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.