Mullins v. State

Ruffin, Judge.

A jury found Craig Mullins guilty of armed robbery. He appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, we do not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility.1 “Instead, we review the evidence presented at trial in the light most favorable to support the jury’s verdict and determine whether this evidence is sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find [Mullins] guilty of each element of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt.”2

Viewed in this light, the evidence shows that on…