Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
This action is to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, hereinafter referred to as Commission, denying authority for the purchase by plaintiff Navajo of certain operating rights of the plaintiff Strickland. Five motor carriers and one rail carrier have intervened on the side of the defendants. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1336, and 28 U.S.C. § 2325 requires that the case be heard by a three-judge district court.
Navajo and Strickland filed a joint application with the Commission under 49 U.S.C.A. § 5 requesting authority for Navajo to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McLean Trucking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Schaffer Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ratner v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1957
- Denver Chicago Transport Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1960
- Cumberland Motor Freight, Inc. v. Huber & Huber Motor Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hart v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1964
- Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Witte Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Central Maryland Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1965
- Braswell Motor Freight Lines v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967
- Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.