People v. Tripicersky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from court of special sessions, New York county. Bastardy proceedings against Charles Tripicersky. Complainant, Anna Simanck, testified that she had intercourse with defendant from September up to the end of December, 1894, and that from September, 1894, until the birth of her child, on July 30, 1895, she did not have intercourse with any other man. Defendant was adjudged to be the father of complainant’s child, and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBarrett, J.
The defendant was adjudged by the court of special sessions to be the father of the complainant’s bastard child. He appeals upon two grounds: First, that the judgment was not supported by competent evidence; and, second, that it is against the weight of evidence. Neither ground is tenable. The complainant testified that from the time' when she had connection with the defendant until the birth of her child she had no connection with any other person. She was somewhat confused as to tlm date of the *697intercourse, but upon her entire testimony it sufficiently appeared that such intercourse was…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Keller v. ClearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Webb v. HillNew York County Court, Otsego County · 1909
- Keller v. ClearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900