Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Hopson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 27, 1874PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Case 27 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM CHRISTIAN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED 15 B. Mon. 555, Patton v. McCane.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE PRYOR

delivered the opinion oe the court.

William Hull purchased of the appellee, John Hopson; a mule at the price of one hundred and seventy-five dollars, executing his note., with William B. Bevil his surety, for the sum agreed on as follows:

“ Twelve months after date, for value received, we or either of us promise to pay John Hopson, or order, one hundred and seventy-five dollars. This May 6, 1869.

William Hull,

William B. Bevil,”

To which note is annexed the following stipulation:

“ This note is given for a mule, and the mule is bound or the title of the mule remains in Hopson until .'he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Caldwell v. BartlettThe Superior Court of New York City · 1854

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Greer v. Church & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
  2. Murray v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Kilmer v. Moneyweight Scale Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Sinker, Davis & Co. v. ComparetTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Marvin Safe Co. v. EmanuelNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API