Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided July 15, 1975Published

1Opinion of the Court

QUESTION: Are the state and county required to comply with a city's planning and zoning ordinances in the use of state and county property located within the jurisdictional boundaries of that city?

SUMMARY: Until judicially determined to the contrary, and in the absence of express legislative immunity from zoning, it should be assumed that one local governmental unit, in the use of its property located within the jurisdictional boundaries of another local governmental unit, is bound by the zoning regulations of the latter; and, upon application for an exception, variance, or zoning change by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Helseth v. DuboseSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Kentucky Institution for Blind v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  3. United States Steel Corp. v. Save Sand Key, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1974
  4. State Ex Rel. Charlotte County v. AlfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  5. Orange County v. City of ApopkaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API