Legal Opinion
Nossek v. A. H. Todd & Son
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 23, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeksonius, J.
This is an action to recover damages for false arrest.
In August, 1932, the defendant A. H. Todd & Son recovered a judgment in Justice’s Court against the plaintiff for fifty-nine dollars and twenty cents. The defendants Speenburgh & Speenburgh were plaintiff’s attorneys. The - Justice’s Court obtained jurisdiction by proper personal service. The judgment is claimed to have been in conversion, based upon the plaintiff’s failure to account for the proceeds of consigned gasoline and oils sold by him.
In September, 1932, the plaintiff filed a petition in bankruptcy. He was adjudicated bankrupt and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- The Ocean National Bank v. . OlcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Snead v. . BonnoilNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Vernes v. PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- McLoughlin v. New York Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Brown v. GareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coffee v. Peterbilt of Nashville, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Nastasi v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1949
- Grago v. VasselloNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- Warner v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
- Brane v. Le Fevre, New York County Courts1945