Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Estate of Knott

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 22, 1988No. 86-291PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1DissentDooley, J.

I dissent. In this case, the appellant appeared pro se in this Court to contest the granting of a license to sell property of the estate of Clyde Knott in which the appellant is living. The case was fully briefed, but at the argument the parties reported that they had settled the case pursuant to an oral agreement under which the estate would sell the property to appellant’s brother who would convey it to appellant. After the argument, appellee’s counsel sent to appellant a dismissal stipulation. Appellant refused to sign it until she saw the deed that the estate would convey to the brother,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vahlteich v. KnottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  2. Cliche v. ClicheSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  3. Charles Hill v. W. Bruns & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Laryssa Elder, Individually, and as Administratrix of the Goods, Chattels and Credits of Alfred Elder, Deceased v. Metropolitan Freight Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. Estate of Emilo v. St. PierreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Verizon Wireless Barton PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. In Re Verizon Wireless Barton PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API