Legal Opinion

Laney v. Laney

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, Monroe county. Action by Enos Gr. Laney individually, and as administrator of the estate •of James Laney, deceased, against Mary K. Laney. An interlocutory judgment was entered overruling a demurrer to the complaint, and there was an order denying defendant’s motion to dissolve an injunction. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorlett, J.

The complaint alleges that on the 20th day of March, 1885, tie was appointed by the surrogate of Monroe county one of the administra*320tors of James Lanuy, deceased. On the 14th day of March, 1887, the plain? tiff presented to the surrogate’s court of that county his accounts for settlement. In February, 1888, a decree was made by the surrogate’s court settling .the plaintiff’s account as administrator, and directing the payment to the defendant of $5,855.56 for her share in the residue of the estate of the deceased. In December, 1889, the decree was modified so as to reduce the amount to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marie v. . GarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Lorillard v. . ClydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Stilwell v. . CarpenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. N.Y. Harlem R.R. Co. v. . HawsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fraser v. Granite State Provident Ass'nThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1894
  2. City of Ithaca v. CornellNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Barker v. LaneyNew York Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API