Legal Opinion
Girgenti v. Cali-Con, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 12, 1988No. 5786PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStoughton, J.
The defendant has appealed from a judgment for the plaintiff in a wrongful discharge action rendered after trial to the court. The plaintiff has cross appealed from the granting of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the second count of the amended complaint.
*132The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, (2) in basing its conclusion on facts not pleaded, (3) in concluding that the plaintiff was terminated because he took precautions for the purpose of public safety, (4) in concluding that the plaintiff’s termination was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- D'Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Morris v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Fuessenich v. DiNardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Battista v. United Illuminating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Adams v. George W. Cochran & Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Seery v. Yale-New Haven HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Cook v. BieluchConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Cotto v. United Technologies Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Lockwood v. Professional Wheelchair Transportation, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.