Legal Opinion · Dissent

Seaman v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1990No. A90A0415Published

1DissentPope, Judge

I must dissent. I would affirm the forfeiture.

1. “Contraband per se is subject to seizure or forfeiture. An article is deemed to be contraband per se if its possession is illegal.” W. Daniel, Ga. Crim. Trial Practice (1989), § 10-2 at 267-268. The videotapes upon which defendant’s conviction rests are contraband. OCGA §§ 16-12-80; 16-12-83. “Derivative contraband is property whose possession is legal but which has been forfeited because used in an illegal manner. A classic example is a vehicle which has been used to transport contraband liquor.” Blackmon v. B.P.O.E., 232 Ga. 671, 672 (1) (208…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Blackmon v. Brotherhood Protective OrderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. Warshaw v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API