Legal Opinion

In re Proceedings to Punish Teitelbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal .by Adolph Teitelbaum from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New- York Trial Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 12th day of March, 1903, adjudging the appellant guilty of a criminal contempt, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 27th day of March, 1903, denying the appellant’s motion to vacate the first-mentioned order.

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J.:

During the course of a trial in a civil suit in the Supreme Court, wherein one Antonio Cappola was the plaintiff and the appellant herein was defendant, the latter was adjudged guilty of a criminal contempt of court by Mr. Justice Andrews, presiding at the trial. It appears, from what purports to be the evidence taken by the justice, that the criminal contempt, of which the appellant was adjudged guilty, consisted in possessing himself of a paper which contained a contract between the plaintiff in the action and ' the- defendant therein, the same containing matter which was the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Taylor v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. People, Ex Rel. v. . Court of Oyer and TermNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. People v. . McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. People ex rel. Choate v. BarrettNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  5. People Ex Rel. Choate v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Douglas v. AdelNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. In re HanburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Goodman v. SalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  4. In re the Proceedings to Punish Nunns, New York County Courts1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API