Legal Opinion
Pulliam v. Casey
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 10, 1956No. 36010PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.
1. The defendant contends that there was not sufficient evidence to support the verdict for the plaintiff. The facts set forth in this opinion show that there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could determine that the defendant was negligent, and that this negligence was the proximate cause of the injuries sustained by the plaintiff. The general grounds of the motion for a new trial are without merit.
2. Special ground one of the amended motion for a new trial insists that the trial judge erred in charging Code § 68-303 (c) “An operator meeting another vehicle coming from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Supreme Conclave Knights of Damon v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- New York Life Insurance v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- County of Bibb v. HamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- City Ice Delivery Co. v. TurleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Mayor of Macon v. HumphriesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goldstein v. KarrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Smith v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Thomas v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Smith v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963