Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hitchcock Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 1956No. Appeal, 3Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell :

The question raised at the audit of the account of the executor of Mrs. Hitchcock’s will is an important *581one, namely, is the amount wbicb was payable to Mr. Hitchcock’s devisees under a joint will and binding contract executed by Mr. and Mrs. Hitchcock, properly deductible as a debt of Mrs. Hitchcock, in computing the Pennsylvania Inheritance Tax.

The sealed contract provided that Mr. and Mrs. Hitchcock agreed (1) to combine their respective estates; (2) to hold the same as tenants in common; and (3) “that the last survivor shall enjoy the joint estate or…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Cridge's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Stadtfeld EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. McGinley's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Logan v. GlassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API