Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Nathan

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1996No. 95 CA 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UWATKINS, Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether an uninsured motorist carrier is entitled to re-, cover, from a tortfeasor, the payments it made to its insured prior to the insured’s release of the tortfeasor. We affirm the trial court’s decision permitting recovery by the UM carrier against the tortfeasor.

FACTS

On April 20, 1991, the defendant, Sandra Nathan, struck the rear end of Mr. Byford McCreary’s vehicle while it was stopped at an intersection. The impact caused a chain reaction by pushing Mr. McCreary’s vehicle into the vehicle in front of him and that vehicle into the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bond v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. v. SonnierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  3. Bosch v. CummingsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  4. Egros v. PemptonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  5. Sicarelli v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dickens v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Mississippi Bar v. CliftonMississippi Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API