Legal Opinion
State v. Senko
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 31, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Justice.
In this, the first operating-under-the-influence ease involving a moped to reach us, it was alleged that the Defendant, Andrew J. Senko, on August 21, 1982, at South Portland, had operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; and the parties had stipulated that the vehicle then and there operated was a moped.
When the District Court (Ninth District, Portland) granted the Defendant’s pre-trial motion to dismiss the complaint on the *825ground that our statute, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B, does not embrace the operator of a moped, the State appealed to this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. JordanAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1977
- United States v. StancilDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. LyonsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chapman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Diggs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- Diggs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988