Flint v. Van Deusen
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from an order made at the Otsego Special Term, denying a motion to set aside an order granted ex pa/rte, requiring the plaintiff to file security for costs.
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, J.;
The plaintiff recovered a judgment herein against the defendants, from which the defendants appealed. Thereafter the plaintiff removed from the State, and the defendants, pending the appeal, obtained an order requiring him to file security for costs, on the ground that he had become a non-resident since the commencement of the suit. The only question is whether the case is within the meaning and spirit of the statute. (2 R. S., 620, §§ 1, 2.) We are inclined to think that after the plaintiff has recovered judgment in the suit, which entitles him to the costs of the action, he cannot…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Traver v. NicholsNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Fenno v. DickinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Gardner v. KellyThe Superior Court of New York City · 1849
- People ex rel. Tomb v. Judges of the county of WashingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1823