Tro-X, L.P. v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson
This case involves a claim by TRO-X, L.P. that it is entitled to a back-in percentage of the working interest in five mineral leases under which Anadarko Petroleum Company is lessee. The trial court agreed with TRO-X, but the court of appeals did not, and reversed. We affirm.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
In early 2007, TRO-X, as lessee, executed mineral leases with David E. Cooper; Hill-Cooper, Ltd.; Richard W. Cooper; Kendall C. Hill; and Shirley Cooper (collectively, the Coopers). These leases (the 2007 Leases) contained identical terms, including a clause that required TRO-X to drill…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- T.O. Stanley Boot Co. v. Bank of El PasoTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Ridge Oil Co., Inc. v. Guinn Investments, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- David J. Sacks, P.C. v. HadenTexas Supreme Court · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- McAllen Hospitals, L.P. D/B/A McAllen Medical Center and South Texas Health Systems v. Yolanda Lopez, Sheryl Hamer, Elmer Deguzman and Richard WeckerTexas Supreme Court · 2019
- Cimarex Energy Co. v. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2019
- AZZ, Inc. v. Southeast Texas Industries, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2026
- Apache Corporation v. Apollo Exploration, LLC Cogent Exploration, Ltd., Co. And Sellmoco, LLCTexas Supreme Court · 2023
- Apache Corporation v. Apollo Exploration, LLC Cogent Exploration, Ltd., Co. And Sellmoco, LLCTexas Supreme Court · 2023
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.