Legal Opinion

DeCarlo v. Hubbard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 12, 1990No. 90-0735PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HERSEY, Chief Judge.

This appeal concerns an order denying a motion to vacate a default. The trial court declined to accept appellants’ explanation for their failure to file a responsive pleading ■ as “excusable neglect.” We agree, based upon the rationale of Somero v. Hendry General Hosp., 467 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, Hayslip v. Somero, 476 So.2d 674 (Fla.1985). The affidavit appellants submitted to the trial court failed to “allege ultimate facts so that the trial judge [could] determine the neglect in question was excusable....” Tremblay v. March, 378 So.2d 855, 856 (Fla. 4th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Somero v. Hendry General Hosp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Farish v. Lum's, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1972
  3. Abrams v. PaulDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Board of Regents v. Stinson-Head, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Tremblay v. MarckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ellish v. RichardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API