Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Niceta

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 30, 2023No. 33/22PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas L. Lloyd v. Anna Cristina Niceta, No. 33, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Hotten, J. FAMILY LAW – POSTNUPTIAL AGREEMENTS – LIQUIDATED DAMAGES CLAUSES – The Supreme Court of Maryland held that a liquidated damages framework did not apply to postnuptial agreements and was inappropriate for evaluating a $7 million lump sum provision that, as applied in this case, triggered if the husband engaged in adultery. In non-marital contracts, liquidated damages operate as “a sum that will compensate the nonbreacher . . . in lieu of the compensatory contract damage[s] to which the nonbreacher…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Clancy v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Peters v. Early Healthcare Giver, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Weichert Co. v. FaustCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Bruce v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. CS Anaheim Hotel Investments LLC v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2025
  2. David Reed v. LTN Global Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2026
  3. Reed v. LTN Global Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  4. Textron Systems Corporation v. Barzan Aeronautical LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API