Alexander M. Crofoot v. Government Printing Office
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.
The petitioner appeals from a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board), Docket No. DC07528211510REM, that found a nexus between the petitioner’s removal for having pled guilty to and been *496convicted of the crime of false pretenses and the efficiency of the service. We affirm.
I
A. The petitioner was employed as a photocomposition keyboard operator at the United States Government Printing Office (agency). On February 17, 1981, the petitioner filed a claim for workers’ compensation, asserting that he had suffered a work-related leg injury. As a result of this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Loyce E. Hayes v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Arthur Bruce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- James A. McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Joseph Griffin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shirley Zingg v. Department of the Treasury, Irs.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Ricky N. Dawson v. Department of Agriculture, Merit Systems Protection Board2014
- Ricky N. Dawson v. Department of Agriculture, Merit Systems Protection Board2014
- Alexander M. Crofoot v. Government Printing OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Zingg v. Department of the Treasury, IrsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004