Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Anaheim Water Co. v. Semi-Tropic Water Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1883Published

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing, a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1ConcurrenceThornton, J.

I concur: I am of opinion that the plaintiffs have failed to make out any case for relief upon the grounds of prescription or estoppel in pais. The reasoning on these points in the opinion of Justice Boss is conclusive.

On whatever rules the rights of the parties herein are to be admeasured, whether by the rules applicable to appropriation, or those applicable to the common-law doctrine of riparian rights, the rights of the parties are at least equal; neither has made out a claim superior to the other. There has never been any exclusive appropriation by plaintiffs prior to that of defendant,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Belknap v. TrimbleNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Lyon v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859
  3. Arthur v. Case & HarwoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
  4. Brown v. AshleyNevada Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API