Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood v. Kline

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 5, 2008No. 98,747Published

1ConcurrenceDavis, J.

I concur in the result and agree with the majority opinion that the issue before us is District Attorney Phill Kline’s handling of the records since our decision in Alpha Med. Clinic v. Anderson, 280 Kan. 903, 128 P.3d 364 (2006). Our concern in this case has been and is the “constitutional privacy rights that Kline’s behavior threatens.” 287 Kan. at 406. I disagree with the majority’s analysis on two specific points: (1) the majority’s implicit finding that Kline’s actions constituted the unlawful performance of a public duty or unlawful exercise of public office; and (2) the majority’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API