Legal Opinion

Ambassador Associates v. Corcoran

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.), entered July 6, 1989, denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granting defendant the Home Insurance Company’s cross motion for summary judgment, to the extent of declaring that the terms of a certain insurance policy do not require said defendant to, inter alia, "drop down” coverage for a loss of less than $11,000,000, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Order of the same court, entered January 5, 1990, denying plaintiffs’ motion for renewal and/or reargument, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pergament Distributors, Inc. v. Old Republic InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Ambassador Associates v. CorcoranNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Zurich-American Insurance v. Mead Reinsurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. Maurice Goldman & Sons, Inc. v. Hanover InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State Insurance Fund v. International InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API