Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Kerpel

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Fitzpatrick, J.

In an action to foreclose a first mortgage on real property owned by the defendant Madalene T. Kerpel and for a deficiency judgment against the defendant and the defendant Julius Kerpel, her husband, plaintiff moves for summary judgment.

The other defendants have appeared in the action but have not answered the complaint and have offered no opposition to this motion.

On June 14, 1956, the plaintiff loaned the defendants the sum of $15,000 and the defendants executed their bond for that amount. The defendant Madalene T. Kerpel gave a first mort*857gage on her aforesaid real property as security for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clarke v. . SheehanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Durante Bros. & Sons, Inc. v. Flushing Nat. BankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
  2. Exeter Holding, Ltd. v. Starling Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Farber v. Republic Pension Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Goodman v. OlsenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API