Legal Opinion

Sliosberg v. New York Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1926PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The defendant issued two policies of life and endowment insurance to plaintiff in the course of its Russian business. The orders here for review involve the rights of a policy holder to recover on the policies so issued. In each both sides appeal, the plaintiff from a dismissal of the second cause of action for insufficiency, with leave to amend, and the defendant from the denial of a motion to dismiss the first cause of action, or in the alternative for a stay. Defendant moved to dismiss on the theory that the court was without jurisdiction of the subject-matter and also for insufficiency.

The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Richard v. Credit SuisseNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Sokoloff v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. National Contracting Co. v. Hudson River Water Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Meacham v. Jamestown, Franklin & Clearfield RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Russian Reinsurance Co. v. StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. E. Gerli & Co. v. Cunard S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. Brucker v. Georgia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Export Insurance v. Mitsui Steamship Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  4. Auerbach v. Grand National PicturesNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API