Andrasko v. Calkins
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarman F. Ball, J.
If a plaintiff is no caused on the issues of negligence or contributory negligence in a suit against the owner of an automobile, is this no-cause judgment available as a res judicata defense as to these same issues in a subsequent action brought by the same plaintiff against the operator of the automobile, if the operator was not a party in the first action? This is the question to be determined on this motion.
*817Plaintiff argues that the defense of res judicata is available only to those who were adversary parties in the prior action, or their privies. There is little question that this is the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. EmeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. JopesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Castle v. . NoyesNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Elder v. New York & Pennsylvania Motor Express, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Glaser v. HuetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gribben v. Lucky Star Ranch Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985