Legal Opinion
Bullock v. Hana Security Services
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 29, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2022-2608Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL BULLOCK, Plaintiff, v. No. 22-cv-02608 (DLF) HANA SECURITY SERVICES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION After Michael Bullock was fired from his job as a security guard with Hana Industries, Inc., the Federal Protective Service, a division within the Department of Homeland Security, determined that Bullock was unfit to work on Federal Protective Service contracts. Bullock, acting pro se, filed this action against the Service’s director as well as his former employer, alleging, among other things, that the Service’s fitness…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Sierra Club v. MainellaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Kenneth Fox v. Hillary ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.