Legal Opinion

Phillip v. Post

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1944No. Docket No. 11, Calendar No. 41,974PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

Plaintiff filed a declaration against defendant John Post in trespass on the case claiming that Post had obtained certain merchandise from him by fraud and deceit, and asked for $245.33 judgment. On trial by jury defendant moved for a directed verdict on the ground that plaintiff had not filed in the office of the county clerk of Muskegon county a certificate of doing business under an assumed name, as required by Act No, 101, Pub, Acts 1907, as amended by Acts Nos. 272, 274, Pub. Acts 1931 (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9825 et seq. [Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, § 9825 et seq., Stat Ann. § 19.821 et…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winget v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Meehl Ex Rel. Eagle Indemnity Co. v. Barr Transfer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Denton v. BoothMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Levin v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Barton v. Thompson's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Caruso v. Local Union No. 690 of International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  2. Bankers Trust Co. v. BradfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API